Tender Abuses

On December 28, 2012, the municipality of Prizren had published a contract notice for “supply of food items to the members of Parliament and civil servants of the municipal administration of the city of Prizren”, according to which the interested economic operators should have submitted their documents until January 7, 2013, at 15:00. The tender, according to the laws in power, was open until January 8, 2013. Moreover, the notice for contract to Ben-Af company was issued on January 23, 2013 and the total value of 43.600 euros or 100 euros per person. Surprisingly, the entire administration and Ramadan Buja, the head of Prizren, were caught shopping on the New Year’s Eve in the shopping center Ben-af. This allows concluding that the tender was done against the judicial frames.

Abdullah Limani, KRPP expert, said that this procedure was against the law for tenders. “What happened to tender for the supply of food items in Prizren is against any procurement standard,” Limani said. “Supplies, works or services must not be performed once, and then the procedure”.

Fatmir Kastrati, AAK, claims that he used his 100 euros to buy in Ben-af. “The decision of assembly was lawful, but then the procurement law was violated and this is not the problem of municipal councilors,” Kastrati said.

The LDK informing department in Prizren reacted with a statement, according to which, without even meeting the legal terms of procurement, the municipality prejudiced the tender winner; therefore, eliminating real competition and violating the law.

Abdullah Thaci, the information department of the LDK, said that “the municipality identified the winners themselves and just then formally announced tenders”.

Naim Cahan, an official of the organization KDI, said that based on the calculation of this organization, the sum of 43 600 euros would have been sufficient to give 80 euros to 45 families with social cases per month annually.

Legal Officer of Ben-af, Besnik Kuqi, claimed that the firm had fulfilled “all the conditions required for the competition” and that it had won the tender. It is the duty of the municipality of Prizren to reason the documentation given to Ben-af.

Acting chief of the procurement office in Prizren, Alban Susuri, said that the contract has not been signed because the municipality has no means. And he added that he has no clue why these groceries were bought in Ben-Af by the administration.

He noted that although Ben-Af wondered the tender, the contract has yet to take effect because the municipality doesn’t have the money to pay for it.

However, the municipal spokesman Ymer Berisha said the decision was taken in accordance with the municipal assembly procedures.

“Some officials, including the mayor, have not withdrawn the funds,” said Berisha. “I would like to confirm the citizens that we are within the practices of decision-making”.

There are also other problems with the same content in Prizren. Opposition parties which were interviewed have criticized the municipality that since 2009 has invested about 900 thousand euros for the construction of the cultural center in Zhur, but it is not finished. The construction of this object, according to the contract between the Municipality of Prizren and firm “Elshani”, should have been finished within a period of 150 days. So far, they have spent about 800 days.

Florin Beqiri, director of local government audit in the Office General of the Auditor in Pristina, said the facility had been audited and found that its construction had not been foreseen at the procurement plan.

Revelations of the legally suspect contract come as Prizren faces a corruption scandal.

In February, a prosecutor from the EU rule of law mission, EULEX, indicted the mayor, Ramadan Muja, and five other municipal officials for corruption involving the illegal use of municipal land. Muja has dismissed the allegations as politically motivated.

The Investigations on Massacre of Krusha e Vogel

Krusha e Vogel is the place where one of the most horrible massacre took place during the war of 1999. 113 civilians were killed; 86 of the bodies are not found yet and the assumptions are that they were cremated or thrown in the river Drini i Bardhe. One of the survivors claims that the entire village ran to the mountains since they were surrounded by the Serbian forces. Kosovars were separated in men, women and children where all men were killed, even if they were thirteen years old.

Prosecutor Michalczuk, when asked about the start and proceedings of investigations towards Krusha e Vogel answered “We have officially launched investigations in late May of last year. Exactly 31 May 2012. At least, the number of suspects reaches number 56, for now.” Also he claimed that they cooperate with Serbia and ICTY in The Hague.

Michalczuk is optimistic towards finding evidence, even though fourteen years have passed since the massacre. “Once completed the process of gathering evidence, we will, first, talk to the perpetrators individually accountable for their individual actions, and then issue the arrest at a proper time, if we collect enough evidence”, says Michalczuk.

According to Michalczuk UNMIK have not done any kind of investigation regarding this massacre. However, Mr. Salgado – UNMIK, through a letter towards “Justice in Kosovo” wrote that there were some findings from UNMIK but all was handled to ICTY in The Hague.

Eduard Gold, head of unit for war crimes in EULEX, claims that the investigations have started from 2008 by EULEX.

“The case of Krusha e Vogel actually began when EULEX received mandate in 2008. The difficulties we had in this case been, at first, of course, the period of transition from UNMIK to EULEX, for a while”, said Gold.

When asked about the time that these investigations could take, Gold added: “There is a lot of information about the suspects, even for witnesses. The time needed to check all this information is too long. Once we see that there is sufficient evidence to proceed further, of course we will continue the investigation. I will not give timeline, but of course we do not want to take too much time.”

There is a huge disappointment in between people in Krusha e Vogel. One of the survivors claim that the investigations are done unprofessionally and feel skeptic whether the aggressors will pay for their crimes.

“For two days Krusha e Vogel lost 102 people. First Day on March 25 has lost nine people, while a second day another 102 people missing, “says Agron Limani, director of the association “26 March 1999”. Moreover, the distrust among the population became even higher when UNMIK promised that the aggressors will be imprisoned but did nothing.

In summation, apart from the massacre in Krusha e Vogel, many massacres took place in Kosovo during the war of 1999 and are waiting for the attackers to pay for the damages.

The work of EULEX Prosecutors

“Justice in Kosovo” interviewed three EULEX prosecutors to acknowledge their work and prosperities achieved related to fighting the serious crimes in Kosovo.

The prosecutor Cezary Michalczuk has worked in Poland as a prosecutor for fifteen years. He claims that his main reasons for coming in Kosovo are his idealism and his desire to share his knowledge for the greater good.

Asked why he decided to come in Kosovo and leave his decent job in Poland he said “I could give you my personal reasons. When I was in Poland, I was a specialist in certain areas of criminal law, and since many of my colleagues did not know about the European criminal law, I believe that it is my duty to transmit my knowledge.” This logic applies about his coming in Kosovo.

Also, Nita Amin who has worked in UK for twenty eight years has a decent background as a prosecutor since she had dealt with various crimes in the United Kingdom.

The third prosecutor, Philip, was a defense counselor, depute judge, and a public prosecutors for eighteen years. His main reason for coming in Kosovo is because of the so called “seconded” – a temporarily transfer from his own country.

 “In Kosovo, in terms of the crime I deal with similar criminal acts [as in the United Kingdom]: murderers, aggravated murderers, unlawful possession of weapons, human trafficking etc.” added Amin when asked about the types of crimes that are under her department.

In regard to the collection of evidences towards the attacks that happened on 14-17 March 2008, Amin added “Well, as you know, the events took place 14th – 17th of March 2008; therefore, the investigation was conducted by the former UNMIK police officers and they launched a Task Force investigation and all the evidence was collected by UNMIK.”

“Justice in Kosovo” implied that there were a lot of records where more than six attackers were identified, and Amin added that one of her tasks is to find out more suspects since the investigations are still open.

The Task Force was created by UNMIK since the attacks against KFOR soldiers happened in Mitrovica from 14-17 March, 2008 and its mission is to investigate, arrest and prosecute serious crimes.

An international officer was killed during this crime event in Mitrovica, where according to Amin that issue is still open and the murderer is not found yet.

“Justice in Kosovo” emphasized that there were 10 Kosovars killed in 2000 in Mitrovica and asked whether there are any investigations done towards it. Amin answered “I am aware of the incident. As for the investigation I cannot answer because that’s not one of the cases that it is in within my office, and since it happened during the UNMIK times I am not sure whether they handed the investigation to EULEX or not.” The same answer was in regard to the question about the crimes that happened during 2004.

Referring to the case of the murder of Selver Haradinaj, Amin implies: “That investigation is still open. It is a joint investigation between EULEX, the local prosecution office, the local police and the police of EULEX. The investigation continues.”

In conclusion, Task Force mainly deals only with the incidents that happened towards the KFOR soldiers and there are six suspects. Regarding the incidents that happened in 2000 and 2004 this is not under their department and these cases are not solved yet.

Six Plead Not-Guilty to Threatening BIRN’s Xharra

Six defendants accused of waging a hate campaign in the media against BIRN Kosovo director Jeta Xharra have pleaded not guilty, though Sami Lushtaku did offer a qualified apology.

Lushtaku’s lawyer, Arianit Koci, told the court on Monday that his client “never intended to threaten Jeta Xharra… The indictment is extremely inaccurate”.

“General Lushtaku never intended to threaten Jeta Xharra, that’s why he publicly seeks her forgiveness,” Koci said.

According to the indictment, a campaign against Xharra was launched after Radio Television Kosovo broadcast an edition of BIRN’s TV programme, ‘Jeta ne Kosove’ (‘Life in Kosovo’,) dealing with alleged mismanagement in Skenderaj/Srbica where Lushtaku was mayor at the time.

Lushtaku is charged, along with Infopress’s former owner, Rexhep Hoti, former executive director Arizona Dibra, former editor-in-chief Avni Azemi and former journalists Rizah Hajdari and Qani Mehmeti, with making threats against Xharra and violating her rights in May and June of 2009.

“This had nothing in common with professional let alone ethical journalism but was merely aimed at tarnishing their victims’ reputations through defamation and silencing them through threats against their lives,” a EULEX special prosecutor, Maria Bamieh, said.

“The financial dependency of the newspaper on [the ruling] PDK [party] advertisements, as well as the staffing of Infopress with persons that were close to or direct members of the PDK formed the motive to pervert the right of freedom of the press and corrupt it in the most shameful way, with the intention of putting Jeta Xharra ‘out of business,’” she added.

BIRN Kosovo director Xharra said Infopress “intentionally misinterpreted me and my programme in order to spread hatred,” she told the court on Monday.

In 12 articles published by Infopress, Xharra was called a “Serbian spy”, a “professional bomb”, an “embassy slut” and subjected to other insults, the indictment says.

The defendants all pleaded not guilty.

Hoti, former owner of Infopress, accused the prosecution of “abuse of office”, saying he felt “embarrassed and insulted after the biased presentation [by the prosecution]”.

Dibra, former executive director of the daily, said “she had no clue why she was in court… I never dealt with any editorial politics at Infopress.”

The other defendants also asked the court to dismiss the indictment.

Xharra continued her testimony on Tuesday, commenting on the articles published in Infopress.

Referring to the article “A programme which terrorized Drenica” written by Qani Mehmeti, Xharra said “it was a call for a lynch”.

She also mentioned an interview given to the daily by mayor Lushtaku on June 2 of 2009, entitled: “Lushtaku: Jeta Xharra – servant to the Serbian Police”.

The trial is due to continue on Wednesday.

BIRN Kosovo Wins Three Journalism Awards

BIRN Kosovo’s ‘Gazeta Jeta ne Kosove’ (‘Life in Kosovo Newspaper’) won three journalism awards on Monday, including the ‘best journalist of 2012’ prize.

BIRN Kosovo wins journalistic prizes

The newspaper’s reporter Parim Olluri was named the best journalist of 2012 by the Association of Professional Journalists of Kosovo for a number of investigative stories published during the year.

‘Gazeta Jeta ne Kosove’ won most of the annual awards given out by the Association’s jury this year.

The ‘best culture story’ award was given to Jeton Musliu for the article ‘Kosovo Textbooks Soften Line on Ottoman Rule’ and Virtyt Gacaferri won the prize for the best sports story with ‘The Match That Showed Many Albanian Realities’.

The Kosovo daily ‘Koha Ditore’ was awarded for publishing the best economic and social feature, written by Vehbi Kajtazi and Visar Preberza, while Agron Halitaj won the award for the best political feature.

Jeton Llapashtica from another Kosovo daily, ‘Zeri’, was given the prize for writing the best investigative story, while photographer Ridvan Svilova got the award for the best photo.

Private television broadcaster Klan Kosova received two prizes, with the channel’s Naim Selmani receiving the award for the best sports feature and Ilir Hasani the award for best camerawork.

Kosovo Court Holds BIRN Media Harassment Hearing

The court in Pristina held a closed session in the case against a municipality chief and a group of newspaper staff over a slur campaign against BIRN Kosovo director Jeta Xharra.

A protected witness testified on Tuesday in the case against the head of the Skenderaj/Srbica municipality, Sami Lushtaku, and a group of five journalists and executives from the now-defunct Infopress newspaper, who are all accused of staging a negative media campaign against Xharra.

The hearing was held behind closed doors because the witness is protected by the EU rule of law mission in Kosovo, EULEX, due to their involvement in another case. The testimony was presented to the court via video link.

Lushtaku is charged, along with Infopress’s former owner Rexhep Hoti, former executive director Arizona Dibra, former editor-in-chief Avni Azemi and former journalists Rizah Hajdari and Qani Mehmeti with making threats against Xharra and violating her citizen’s right to equality in May and June of 2009.

According to the indictment, the campaign was launched after Radio Television Kosovo broadcast an edition of BIRN’s TV programme, ‘Jeta ne Kosove’ (‘Life in Kosovo’) dealing with alleged mismanagement and unfavourable conditions in Skenderaj/Srbica where Sami Lushtaku was acting chief at the time.

Over the course of 12 articles published by Infopress, Xharra was called a “Serbian spy”, a “professional bomb” and subjected to other insults, the indictment says.

The trial started earlier this month and the next hearing is scheduled for April 15.

BIRN’s legal adviser participates in justice system discussion

BIRN Kosovo’s legal adviser Flutura Kusari spoke at an expert roundtable on the subject of citizens’ rights and accountability in the Kosovo justice system that was organised by Advocacy Training and Resource Centre in cooperation with Centre for Legal Aid and Regional Development as well as law firm Sejdiu and Qerkini.

BIRN’s legal adviser participates in justice system discussion

The roundtable involved the United States ambassador Tracy Ann Jacobson, Kosovo’s justice minister Hajredin Kuci, Michelle Lakomy from the US Department of Justice and several media and civil society representatives. 

Jacobson expressed her dissatisfaction with the justice system and suggested that everyone involved in it needed to work harder and with greater commitment in order to strengthen confidence in the judiciary.

Jacobson referred to the case of Diana Kastrati, who was killed by her estranged husband, saying the municipal court in Pristina showed a lack of responsibility by not issuing a protection order within 24 hours despite her request for one. 

The case was seen by many of the roundtable’s participants as a critical example of the justice system failing Kosovo’s citizens.

Kuci also admitted the judiciary was dysfunctional and said it should increase its transparency and accountability.

Kusari meanwhile addressed a range of problems that citizens as well as journalists face on a daily basis, including the lack of spokespeople for the Kosovo Judicial Council and the Kosovo Procurement Council as well as the outdated web-sites of relevant institutions, both judicial and prosecutorial. 

Based on a BIRN court monitoring project, Kusari also pointed out that the majority of court hearings are held in judges’ offices, not in trial chambers.

Kosovo Campaign Targets Proposed New Power Plant

The Kosovo Civil Society Consortium for Sustainable Development, KOSID, and a group of other organisations including BIRN Kosovo, launched a media campaign on Friday to raise awareness about the environmental damage that the project to build a new power plant will cause.

The campaign was launched at a press conference in Pristina on the same day as Kosovo’s government began consultations about the proposed new coal-fired power station which is slated to be built in the Obiliq/Obilic region, where two other power plants are already operating.

KOSID said that institutions like the World Bank that support the project must “explain why they are investing in projects which take people’s lives, impoverish them and destroy the environment they live in, when there are more feasible and ecologically sound options that cost less”.

Investments in hydropower plants, wind, biomass, geothermal and solar sources would cost less and safeguard the environment, KOSID argued.

“These investments would also create three times more employment possibilities, which is very significant taking into account that over 40 per cent of our workforce is unemployed,” KOSID said

KOSID referred to a World Bank Report published last year which said that in 2010 alone, environmental pollution in Kosovo caused 835 early deaths, 310 new cases of chronic bronchitis, 22,900 new cases of respiratory diseases among children (mostly asthma), 11,600 emergency visits to country’s hospitals and over 100 million euro in direct costs connected to this problem.

“Despite being aware of these facts, the government of Kosovo and the World Bank continue to support the development of a new thermal power plant in the country, although this project will pollute the Kosovo environment for the next 40 years, which means that our children would be threatened even when playing in their backyards,” KOSID said.

BIRN Kosovo has been a member of KOSID since it was established and has been directly engaged in organising the campaign.

“Being a mother of two children, I was shocked when I saw the data,” said Jeta Xharra, BIRN director for Kosovo.

For more information on the subject please visit www.kosid.org and KOSID and Sierra Club blog sierraclub.typepad.com/compass/2013/02/new-ads-highlight-world-banks-deadly-coal-plans-for-kosovo.html.

Follow the Paper Trail

Follow the Paper Trail, a guide to document-based journalism in Kosovo, explains relevant laws, access to public documents, how to publish safely, where to find databases on investigative journalism, and how to locate documents online through various search engines.

Download the Guide: English
| Albanian

FollowFor those wanting to uncover wrongdoing, knowing how to follow the paper trail is crucial, and this means a strong grasp of relevant media laws, a host of web-based skills and the ability to manage large quantities of documents.

Journalists must know how to prize documents from secretive institutions using ,Right to Know” laws but also find key reports which are already in the public do-main, many online. An in-depth knowledge of Google and other online search tools is also essential.

Reporters who cannot follow the paper trail across borders will soon find they are hitting brick walls in their quest for truth.

BIRN Kosovo Presents Report on Court Monitoring

The Balkan Investigative Reporting Network (BIRN) in Kosovo published its fifth report on court monitoring for the January-December 2012 period on Wednesday.  The information in the report was the result of monitoring a total of 1,441 court sessions, which resulted in 1,040 verdicts.

BIRN’s main findings are categorised in twelve points which refer to a variety of problems ranging from the monitoring of corruption cases, procedural violations, failure to respect the rights of parties during court hearings, to the use of mobile phones during the trial sessions.

The press conference at which the BIRN report was presented was attended by representatives of several judicial institutions including the Kosovo Judicial Council, the Supreme Court of Kosovo, the State Prosecution, the Ombudsperson, representatives of embassies in Kosovo, representatives from OSCE, EULEX, and civil society.

The head of the Judicial Council of Kosovo, Enver Peci, congratulated BIRN for the work conducted so far, which, he said “represents a target for the fields where the judicial system should be more engaged”.

The  President of the Supreme Court, Fejzullah Hasani, said that BIRN had helped to illuminate errors which legal officials had been unable to investigate. 

“I have read BIRN’s report carefully and with pleasure, and I express congratulations for the realistic findings that are welcome for our work,” said the special prosecutor, Besim Kelmendi.

Diane E. Tourell, legal analyst at the OSCE, also complimented the BIRN report and emphasised that the OSCE echoes the concerns caused by procedural violations and would welcome similarly thorough reports in the future.

Download the full report as a PDF file in English
Download the full report as a PDF file in Albanian