Launched on Tuesday, the report, Freedom of Information in the Western Balkans: 2025 Annual Report, is based on BIRN journalists’ work during 2025 and provides a regional analysis of FOI practices across Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia and Serbia.
The report is BIRN’s seventh annual assessment of access to information practices in the region. It examines the regulatory environment, legislative developments and the practical implementation of FOI laws, drawing on 1,740 freedom of information requests submitted by BIRN journalists in 2025.
While the report notes that the right to information remains constitutionally and legally guaranteed across the region, it warns that legal standards are still not consistently translated into practice.
BIRN’s data shows that 58.22 per cent of FOI requests received full approval in 2025, marking an improvement compared to previous years. However, 28.16 per cent of requests received no response at all, showing that administrative silence remains one of the most persistent barriers to transparency.
The report also identifies a continued enforcement gap. BIRN filed 201 complaints to FOI oversight bodies in 2025, but 58.21 per cent of them remained unresolved by the end of the year. Even where oversight bodies ruled in favour of disclosure, institutions failed to provide the requested information in 76.62 per cent of cases.
Judicial remedies also remained limited and slow. Only 3.2 per cent of FOI cases resulted in court proceedings, while very few were finalised during the year, reducing the value of information that often loses relevance when it arrives too late.
The report highlights that access to information remains essential for investigative journalism, particularly in areas of high public interest such as public procurement, public spending, environmental risks, surveillance technologies, strategic investments and institutional accountability.
However, BIRN journalists across the region reported that they continue to face delays, broad use of exemptions, procedural obstacles and inconsistent institutional responses. In some cases, public institutions relied on administrative silence, personal data protection, confidentiality, commercial secrecy or ongoing proceedings to withhold information.
The findings show that access to information often depends less on legal guarantees and more on persistence, legal knowledge, institutional willingness and newsroom capacity.
Recommendations
The report called on governments and public institutions to improve transparency by:
- Applying sanctions against institutions that systematically delay or obstruct access;
- Shorter deadlines for information that already exists in documented form;
- Greater proactive transparency, including publication of budgets, contracts, procurement data;
- Improved digitalisation and electronic access systems;
- Stronger independence and capacity for FOI oversight bodies;
- Clearer limits on legal exemptions to FOI (e.g. personal data protection, commercial secrecy etc.) and clearer proportionality tests to ensure the public interest prevails.
Independent FOI oversight bodies were urged to strengthen enforcement, prioritise cases of public interest, improve monitoring of institutional compliance and make better use of sanctioning mechanisms.
The report also recommended that journalists and media organisations continue documenting obstruction, use appeal mechanisms strategically and invest in legal knowledge and newsroom capacity to defend the right to access public information.
The findings were presented during the online launch event “Transparency in Focus: Freedom of Information in the Western Balkans 2025”, which gathered journalists, institutional representatives and FoI experts from across the region. The event opened with introductory remarks by Gentiana Murati, followed by a presentation of key findings by Megi Reçi, Research Lead and Author at BIRN Hub.
The launch featured two panel discussions:
– A discussion on the gap between law and practice, with journalists and institutional representatives from Albania, Kosovo and Montenegro;
– A discussion on appeals, enforcement and the public interest, focusing on cases where information arrives too late to be useful.
Panelists included BIRN journalists Arbrita Uka, Jovana Damjanović, Vladimir Karaj, Goce Trpkovski and Nermina Kuloglija, as well as institutional representatives Biljana Božić, Krenare Sogojeva Dërmaku, Slavoljupka Pavlović and Petar Gajdov. The panels were moderated by Xhorxhina Bami and Gordana Andric.
Despite some improvements, the report concludes that sustained pressure from journalists, civil society and independent institutions remains crucial to ensure that freedom of information becomes an effective right in practice, rather than only a formal legal guarantee.
The event was organised as part of the Austrian Development Agency-funded project “Paper Trail to Better Governance IV.”
You can read the full report here.






















