BIRN Bosnia Launches ‘Forgotten Victims’ Campaign

BIRN Bosnia and Herzegovina is launching a campaign entitled ‘Forgotten Victims’, aimed at highlighting the victims of war crimes for which no one has yet been convicted under final verdicts.

BIRN Bosnia and Herzegovina on Monday begins its ‘Forgotten Victims’ campaign, which intends to enable victims of unprosecuted war crimes and their families to speak about what they went through and draw public and judicial attention to violations that have still not been prosecuted.
The project is intended to encourage the opening of investigations and the filing of indictments against suspects.
Denis Dzidic, the director of BIRN Bosnia and Herzegovina, said that there have been fewer and fewer war crimes cases launched in the country in recent years.
“The number of war crimes indictments filed at the state level is in decline each year and witnesses to those events are dying, so it is important to draw attention to crimes for which nobody has been tried as yet, particularly to cases in which suspects live outside Bosnia and Herzegovina and are unavailable to prosecutorial authorities,” Dzidic said.
As part of the project, BIRN Bosnia and Herzegovina will publish ten reports about unprosecuted crimes in ten communities.
A photograph of a war victim and their relatives will also be published each Monday over the course of the next ten months, conveying their personal story and calling on judicial institutions to take action.
Although nearly 25 years have passed since the end of the Bosnian war, many victims have still not had an opportunity to testify in court about what they went through and contribute to bringing those responsible to justice.
So far, around 850 people have been sentenced at the state level in Bosnia and Herzegovina to a total of 2,750 years in prison for wartime crimes.
But the state prosecution still has around 500 pending war crimes cases involving identified perpetrators and as many cases against unidentified ones.
The Forgotten Victims project is supported by the government of the United Kingdom and is being implemented by the United Nations Development Programme, UNDP, as part of its Regional War Crimes Project.

BIRN Kosovo Trains Media in Fact-Checking in Gjakova/Djakovica

BIRN Kosovo gave a training course for local media in Gjakova/Djakovica and the surrounding area on January 27, focusing on fact-checking standards in journalism.

During the first part of the training, media representatives looked into the importance of facts in research, learning how to employ BIRN’s own fact-checking tool, the ‘Krypometer’ (‘Truth-o-Meter’).

The second section of the seminar continued with training related to ethics in journalism, truthful reporting, privacy, copyright, and resource protection.

During the third section, participants had the opportunity to gain insight into reporting based on whistleblowing, journalistic security, research based on International Fact-Checking Network standards and in-depth research for television.

The training was led by Visar Prebreza, editor at BIRN Kosovo and Labinot Leposhtica, the head of BIRN’s Legal Office.

Local journalists, media correspondents and court monitors working in the municipalities of Gjakova, Istog, Malisheva and Rahovec participated in the training.

The course was organised by the ‘Civil Society Program for Albania and Kosovo’, funded by the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and managed by the Kosovo Foundation for Civil Society (KCSF) in partnership with Partners Albania for Change and Development (PA).

Xhorxhina Bami

Xhorxhina Bami reports on daily developments in Kosovo and also writes feature, analyses, reviews, interviews, and investigations. Originally from Albania, Xhorxhina been living in Kosovo since 2015.

Her previous experience includes working as a freelance journalist in Kosovo for publications such as Kosovo 2.0, Insajderi and Periskopi, as well as an economic researcher for EU project “Further Support to Trade in Kosovo at the Ministry of Trade and Industry”.

Xhorxhina was featured in Italian media’s Osservatiorio Balcani e Caucaso Transeuropa book “Scoprire i Balcani” (“Discover Balkans”) where one of her Kosovo 2.0 articles has been published.

She participated in a programme for young journalists called the “Shadowing Mentorship Program”, which consisted of working in an immersive course alongside a journalist mentor.

Xhorxhina was awarded for her article: “Asset Allocation after Divorce by Kosovo’s Judiciary”, in an event organised by NGO INJECT, which was supported by E4E and financed by USAID.

She has a Bachelor of Science in Applied Arts and Sciences from Rochester Institute of Technology, Kosovo campus with a certificate of semester completion: HAMK University of Applied Arts and Sciences, Finland.

Xhorxhina speaks Albanian, English and Italian.

BIRN Investigative Resource Desk

BIRN Investigative Resource Desk (B.I.R.D.) is an innovative interactive platform created for journalists who want to keep up-to-date with the fast-changing world of technology without sacrificing their ethics or the standards of professional journalism.

BIRD provides investigative journalists with various types of assistance and a set of tools and resources relating, but not limited, to freedom of information, data access and protection, cyber security and open source datasets. Assistance is free and provided on a needs basis.

An integral part of BIRD is the digital freedom-monitoring database covering the state of digital rights in Southern and Eastern Europe. Recognising the open and global nature of the online arena, the database stresses the importance of a human rights-based approach towards people in the digital environment.

Technical sabotage, stifling freedom of expression and opinion, personal attacks and campaigns of hatred in the digital sphere have all increased as the role of online media, social networks and other platforms has become stronger in Southern and Eastern Europe – societies where traditional media actors are largely controlled and used as political tools.

In this new environment, the role of investigative journalists remains decisive – but how to handle big data, and stay secure and ethical in the open space run by algorithms, is a challenge for all of us. Through BIRD, we want to take an active role in shaping the future of journalism.

2020 Resonant Voices Fellows Selected

Thirteen journalists, activists and researchers will spend the coming months exploring the many facets of radicalisation and media manipulation in the EU and neighbouring states as part of the second generation of Resonant Voices Fellows.

The Resonant Voices Initiative is pleased to announce the new cohort of Resonant Voices Fellows and welcome Filip Balunovic, Valbona Bezati, Saska Cvetanovska, Merxhan Daci, Harun Dinarevic, Vladan Djukanovic, Jelena Djureinovic, Una Hajdari, Andjela Milivojevic, Predrag Momcilovic, Jeton Musliu, Ani Sandu, Fjoralba Sinoruka.

They will join the growing community of researchers, journalists, and activists working to expose and challenge extremist messaging targeting vulnerable audiences in the European Union and its neighbourhood. Fellows’ work also contributes to developing communication strategies as a means to combat these threats.

Similar to the previous year, the competition was fierce, and we received many more high-quality applications than we could support. Selected Fellows will receive funding and professional support from Balkan Investigative Reporting Network editors and experts to conduct in-depth research and investigation.

The ten new fellowships in 2020 are awarded to individuals and teams that will explore audience engagement strategies of media manipulators, trace the origin of far-right memes to discern their international appeal, deconstruct conspiracy theories and analyse the evolution of ideological and political identity of diaspora communities in multiple European countries.

BIRN Launches New Investigative Resource Desk Platform

BIRN is proud to announce BIRD, a unique platform that provides investigative journalists with a set of invaluable tech tools and resources, as well as various types of assistance.

The Balkan Investigative Reporting Network (BIRN) launched a cross-border journalism platform on Thursday with the aim of helping journalists all over the globe by providing them with knowledge and assistance necessary in today’s world.

BIRN Investigative Resource Desk (BIRD) is an innovative interactive platform created for professional and citizen journalists who want to keep up-to-date with the fast-changing world of technology without sacrificing their ethics or the standards of professional journalism.

In times of media deterioration, and with new challenges in the digital sphere that are shaping the world, journalism’s ecosystem is changing fast, and in unpredictable ways. The role of journalists across the world has never been more complex.

BIRD is BIRN’s latest move to strengthen journalism in Southeast Europe and beyond. For months, we have worked together with a team of dedicated journalists, editors and developers to create a platform that is easy to use and provides all relevant information in one place.

As we believe that information is power, our vision was to use the potential of the BIRN network and its knowledge base to create something that can be used widely, for free.

Through BIRD, we wanted to offer journalists an easy way to learn and stay on track with the latest developments in the digital sphere. That way, BIRD users will be able to get all the latest updates on the state of digital freedoms, opportunities within the journalism network and beyond, and news covering these topics.

The platform provides investigative journalists with various types of assistance and a set of tools and resources related, but not limited, to freedom of information, data access and protection, cyber-security and open-source datasets.

The assistance of our experts is free and provided on a needs basis.

BIRD also contains various databases and a set of tools that can be used in daily reporting. Currently, the platform offers 20 different publications on topics such as freedom of information, data protection, journalism sustainability, verifying information and many more. And we intend to add more in future.

As part of our drive for openness, we have also established a free, user-friendly, searchable online library of public documents and scraped database. Called BIRN Source, it currently contains almost 1,300,000 documents, files and records. The numbers will soon rise as the database is being updated in real-time.

BIRN Source is designed to be easily searchable and useful to journalists and editors from Southeast Europe, and all over the world. The database offers text recognition in multiple and all-local languages.

We are also proud of BIRD’s How-to’s section. This is where users will be able to read case studies and guides done by some of the most prominent journalism experts, such as Blake Morrison, Frederik Obermaier, Benjamin Strick and others. We believe that the experience they have shared may motivate journalists to implement some of the solutions in their own newsrooms, and come up with new ideas.

As a result of our partnership with Share Foundation, an integral part of BIRD is the regional digital freedom-monitoring database, covering the state of digital rights in Southern and Eastern Europe (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Hungary, North Macedonia, Romania and Serbia).

Recognising the open and global nature of the online arena, the database stresses the importance of a human rights-based approach towards people in the digital environment.

Together with Share, BIRN journalists will monitor and fact-check cases of digital rights violations across the region as soon as they happen.

The database is searchable by different criteria (date, country, affected party, means of the attack, description, attacker, etc.) and is available in both English and the local languages of the countries where the monitoring is being conducted.

BIRN Database Shows Bosnia Pays Dear for Officials’ Limos

Unique database compiled over months shows how the cash-strapped country spends millions of euros a year on pricey limousines for government officials.

Over 10.6 million KM – equal to 5 million euros – was spent on purchasing 329 official limousines in Bosnia in 2018 whose price averaged 32,000 KM, or about 16,000 euros, a BIRN database reveals. In total, it recorded tenders to procure 1,666 official vehicles, worth about 46 million euros, in 2018.

The BIRN database, which has proved a talking point for the public in Bosnia, shows how Bosnian politicians enjoy overpriced luxury vehicles on a scale without comparison in Europe. It also shows that most of the tenders for the vehicles also had only one bidder, indicating corruption, besides the issue of a serious lack of control of budget spending on cars.

BIRN has meanwhile published dozens of articles of specific cases that have highlighted two important things: first, that there are numerous examples of such overspending, but secondly that stories soon begin to repeat and look the same to the audience, lowering their impact.

By late 2017, BIRN Bosnia was already collecting all tenders related to cars from the public procurement website, the centralized Bosnian government portal where institutions and public companies are obliged to published their tenders. It then published analysis in December showing that around 5 million euros was spent on vehicles in 2017.

After reporting about various violations of public procurement practices, several institutions amended their tender specifications. BIRN then decided it would be more effective to make a complete database, with every tender related to official cars.

It took around six months to work with an IT company to develop the database structure and manually input hundreds of tenders for car purchases and data on more than 3,000 cars into our car registry – where BIRN publish data on existing cars owned by institutions.

In mid-2018, BIRN published the database and the data for first half of that year. After wrapping up the database for whole year, the final figure of more than 93 million Bosnian marks, or more than 46 million euros of total tenders for car purchases in 2018, was a surprise.

The data showed that there is no competition in tenders to buy cars for officials; the vast majority of tenders had only one bidder. It also showed who bought the most expensive cars and how they did it, as well as the preferences in terms of models and brands.

The database also contains a register of vehicles already owned by institutions and public companies, which shows that the average cost per vehicle is around 25,000 euros.

Another important part of the database was a car registry, that now has more than 3,500 cars from numerous government institutions. It is a unique database in Bosnia, as no official data is available in the country on which institutions own what cars, and how much they are worth.

EU Awards: Investigations that Changed Balkans and Turkey

The 21 investigations selected for the 2018 EU awards all highlighted the way courageous journalists in the region continue to raise the bar and challenge cultures of secrecy, corruption and impunity.

From revealing corruption among officials, institutions and public figures to revelations of ties between politicians and criminal organisations, the winners of the 2018 EU Awards for Investigative Journalism in six countries of the Western Balkans and Turkey shaped public opinion and made an impact through exceptional watchdog journalism.

The awards aim to celebrate and promote the outstanding achievements of investigative journalists as well as improve the visibility of quality journalism. In this year’s awards, 30 journalists were given prizes for 21 remarkable investigations.

The 2018 EU Awards kicked off on Turkey, with a dozen quality investigations, but three stood out.

Hayzel Ocak’s investigative story about corruption in the real estate industry, Unprecedented Betrayal”, showed how Istanbul’s urbanization plan was destroyed by privileged zoning rights, which were granted to a few. Ocak was awarded first prize at a ceremony held at the Press House of the Association of Journalists in the capital, Ankara. The jury deemed the story “a product of outstanding and courageous research, which was additionally presented very clearly”.

Second prize in Turkey went to Dinçer Gökçe for “Turkey’s List of Shame (Part 1 & Part 2),” about 115 underage girls and the gross negligence of officials in public hospitals. In his investigation, Gokce examined the records of 115 children who came to hospital between January 1, 2017, and May 9, 2017, one by one.

According to the records, 77 of the 115 found to be pregnant were over the age of 15 while 38 were found to be pregnant below the age of 15. The pregnancies were never reported to the authorities, even though it was mandatory to do so by law. After the publication of Gokce’s investigative article, the authorities launched an investigation against the hospital and everyone involved in these cases. The jury viewed this story as an example of systematic wrongdoing that demonstrated the need for greater transparency in governance. Not only was it expertly researched, but it was also masterly and courageously presented, casting a spotlight on some very serious problems in the country, they said.

Fevzi Kızılkoyun won third prize for an investigation in to the death of Gazi University student Şule Çet, who fell to her death at 4am from the 20th floor of a plaza in the Çankaya district of Çağatay. Her death might have been closed as a suicide had the autopsy report not come into the hands of this journalist. Through a thorough investigation, Kızılkoyun pursued justice in “Secret of the 20th Floor / Truth Revealed by the Autopsy”. The case was eventually closed as a case of rape and murder. The jury stated that the story was researched by the careful and dedicated journalist who had uncovered important evidence despite being confronted by a wall of ignorance.

In North Macedonia, 20 high-quality investigations were in the running for prizes, but three were most noticeable. First prize went to Snezhana Lupevska Sozen, Miomir Serafinovic and Biljana Nikolovska, for Citizens Identity Theft for Criminal Purposes. This researched the fate of Zlate Stojanovski who has wrongly accused and went to jail in a case of stolen identity. The journalists revealed the details of the case, the mistakes made by institutions and the state, and the stolen identity that cost Stojanovski his freedom. The jury members deemed it a product of outstanding research.

Veles, a small town in the north of Northern Macedonia, become famous after the 2016 US presidential elections, when media outlets revealed that young men from here were running over a hundred websites that pumped out often false viral stories in support of the candidacy of Donald Trump. In The Secret Players Behind Macedonia’s Fake News Sites”, Saska Cvetkovska uncovered new information and added fresh details to the story of the fake news boom in Veles. Cvetovska won second prize and praise from the jury for her indepth investigation.

The third prize awardees Kristina Ozimec and Vasko Magleshov investigated North Macedonian MPs’ travel expenses. Ozimec and Magleshov proved, by using FOI requests, that MPs in the country spent around 50,000 euros a month on this purpose only. “Scandalous Amounts for MPs’ Travel Expenses” revealed unessential spending and misuse of public money.

First prize in Albania went to Esemeralda Keta and Elisa Gjerani for Premature Baby Deaths Rise in Albania’s Cash-Starved Hospitals”, an emotional and touching deep probe that exposed the lack of incubators and other medical equipment needed to treat premature babies in Albania’s maternity hospitals – and believed to be a factor behind the alarmingly high child mortality rate in the country.

Endrit Habilaj was awarded second prize for the TV documentary The Destruction of Valbona”, which used footage and documents to show the deterioration of the heart of the “Albanian Alps”, exposing evidence that hydropower developers are building plants illegally and in contravention of court orders, so destroying the environment and tourism.

Ola Mitre won third prize for exposing the added and often hidden cost that patients face when they undergo surgery in private hospitals with medical packages subsidized by the Health Insurance Fund, in The Hidden Costs of Free Cardio Surgeries in Private Hospitals”.

In Montenegro, Jovan Nikitovic won first prize for an extensive investigation into one of the biggest cases of cultural negligence in the country. His investigation into the disappearance, theft, damage or destruction of 14,475 exhibits in the National Museum and other museums in Montenegro.

Second prize in Montenegro went to Maja Boricic who tackled the country’s growing environmental problems in Medical Waste in Montenegro – A lurking menace”. In this well researched and reported story, Borcic presented new information and revealed that not all pharmacies in the capital, Podgorica, follow the same standard when it comes to dealing with medical waste and that the disposal of more than a thousand tonnes of such waste was not supervised.

Dejan Milovac and Lazar Grdinic won third prize for their investigation into donations to the ruling party from the poorest part of Podgorica ahead of elections, which went through the roof. Milovac and Grdinic shone a light on the hidden world of election and party financing frauds in Citizens’ donations, or black-funds”.

In Serbia, the ties between political figures and criminals were revealed in the investigation How Serbia’s Health Minister Helped a Criminal Avoid Trial”, by Dragana Peco and Stefan Dojcinovic, which won the first prize in the EU Awards in Serbia. Their thorough investigation revealed the shady connections between Minister of Health Zlatibor Loncar and mobster Petar Panic, who avoided a court hearing and eventually jail time thanks mainly to his connection to top officials.

Vladimir Kostic and Dina Djordjevic won second prize for their two articles, Small hydroelectric power plants: the state and companies connected to Vucic’s best man profit most”, and “From Nigerian scheme to clandestine EPS procurement worth millions. Kostic and Djordjevic shone a light on the controversial and lucrative business of small hydro-plants. They discovered that more than 7.2 million euros was paid between 2013 and 2016 to companies connected to Nikola Petrovic, the best man of President Aleksandar Vucic, and his business partners.

Milos Stanic discovered that almost a million people in Serbia, Croatia and Hungary are exposed to carcinogenic drinking water with arsenic levels above the legal limit, so winning third prize for Toxic Taps: Arsenic in Water Stirs Cancer Fears”.

In Bosnia and Herzegovina, Amarildo Gutic won first prize for his documentary “The State against David, which reconstructed the last hours of the life of David Dragicevic, a young man whose unresolved death sparked major tensions in the country. The jury’s summary of the award said Gutic had transformed a personal and family tragedy into a story that convincingly spoke about the pathology of institutions and the entire government.

Second prize in Bosnia went to Semir Mujkic for “Corruption in Public Procurements, a series of investigative articles on corruption practices in public procurement in Bosnia published during 2018. In addition to the articles, Mujkic made a database of year-round live tracking of spending on official vehicles.

Renata Radic Dragic and Mubarek Asani won third prize for their multimedia investigation “Veterans against Veterans’ Associations”,  a story that was the result of months of research and data collection from all levels of government. Having reviewed hundreds of documents, they proved that Veterans’ Associations had misused money intended for veterans. They revealed that at least 40 million euros were paid out to about 1,600 veterans’ associations over the six-year period. Some of the money was misused by individuals, and veterans never saw the benefits intended for them.

In Kosovo, Saranda Ramaj won first prize for her investigation, Warehouse of Pharmaceutical Abuse. Ramaj showed that the monopoly created by pharmaceutical companies in 2016 and 2017 enabled them to hike drug prices, and that this was permitted by the state. Ramaj’s story led to an investigation of the Ministry of Health by State Prosecution and the suspension of the sale of questionable drugs.

Second prize went to Serbeze Haxhiaj for “Kosovo’s Political Murders: Unpunished, Not Forgotten”,  a story about the local authorities and international missions that failed to jail the perpetrators of a series of political assassinations and gun attacks after the Kosovo war ended. The jury praised the story for giving “a voice to those who will otherwise not be heard”.

Third prize went to Ardiana Mehmeti for the series “Exploitation in Telecom” (linklink). Mehmeti’s work focused on the business of Telecom of Kosovo whose owners are either unknown or politically connected. After receiving the award, Mehmeti talked about the threats she had received during her investigation, and the money offers she was given to stay silent.

Although the Balkan region is clearly not a safe environment for journalists to produce independent news content, Mehmeti and the others who received awards in the 2018 EU Award cycle showed persistence and perseverance in investigating topics of public interest and importance.

Western Balkans Have Yet to Embrace Freedom of Information

Liberal-sounding access to information laws – vital for a free media – have yet to bring real transparency to the traditionally secretive countries of the Balkan region, a BIRN report shows.

Between January 2017 and June 2019, BIRN journalists submitted 854 official requests to access public documents in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, North Macedonia, Montenegro, and Serbia. With the aid of the information gained from these requests, BIRN produced numerous investigative pieces and so exposed wrongdoing by governments, companies and powerful individuals.

On the basis of the submitted FOI requests, BIRN has also published an in-depth analysis of institutions’ openness to FOI requests across the countries of the Western Balkans. This shows that while Freedom of Information laws in the region are among the most liberal in Europe on paper, implementation of these laws is well below European standards.

Implementation also varies between the Western Balkan countries themselves. Some countries are showing an improvement, for example, by public institutions publishing large amounts of data and documents.

Others, such as Bosnia and Herzegovina, lag behind. It is now the only country in the Balkans that does not even offer access to public records in electronic form. In some other countries, like Montenegro and Serbia, there has been a decline in implementation, as a result of legislative changes and political pressure.

Of the 854 official requests that BIRN submitted to access public documents, less than half of them, 408, were actually approved; 224 were partially approved, meaning the institutions provided only technical information, while 221 requests were either rejected or no answer at all was received, despite repeated follow-ups from the journalists.

Looking at the ratio between requests that were submitted and answered positively, in Albania the score was highest, at 61 per cent. It was followed by Kosovo, at 56 per cent. In Serbia, institutions provided the requested information in 40 per cent of the cases, while in North Macedonia the figure was 33 per cent. The worst response rate was in Bosnia, where institutions replied to only 25 per cent of requests sent.

For many journalists in the Western Balkans, where independent media are often under attack and pressure, Freedom of Information laws are often an important pillar of their own freedom, and are sometimes the only way to obtain information.

In recent years, however, there has been a certain tendency among institutions to close the information door and experiment with new ways to deny public information, especially to journalists, who have been traditionally the most frequent users of these laws.

To withhold information, institutions often either ignore requests or mark the requested information as classified.

In many cases, BIRN journalists have been forced to file complaints in order to get the data they want, or a decision on their request.  This process often lasts long, disrupts journalists’ daily activities and prolongs the whole investigative process, which can end up using outdated data.

In Kosovo, BIRN journalists submitted the majority of their 337 requests to municipalities, ministries, the Telecom Company, the Prosecutorial Council, Judicial Council, the President’s Office, the Prime Minister’s Office and the Procurement Review Body. Of these, 188 were approved, 27 were partially answered and 122 were rejected.

BIRN Kosovo repeatedly submitted complaints about denial of access to public documents. In all cases, the Ombudsman asked the relevant institutions to grant access. But only 45 per cent of these requests resulted in BIRN gaining access to the requested documents. Another 20 per cent of requests resulted in BIRN gaining partial access. The remaining 35 per cent is still pending.

In North Macedonia, BIRN submitted 233 information requests, of which just over a third were approved.

While most countries in the region, such as Serbia, Albania and North Macedonia, have liberal Freedom of Information laws, at least on paper, there is a worrying trend in Montenegro, where latest changes to the law allow the head of an institution to decide which information shall be marked “classified”. This change has been widely criticized, as it contains a series of exclusions that are not in line with international standards or the country’s own constitution.

In Albania, meanwhile, a new law includes a number of novel concepts, including the possibility of re-classifying secret documents, the release of partial information and the use of information technology to make information held by public institutions more available to the public.

In Serbia, BIRN submitted 95 requests. Of these, 13 were fully answered, 25 were partially answered and 20 were rejected or no answer was received. Another 37 requests were still pending by the time of publication. Although the legal deadline for institutions in Serbia to respond to such requests is 15 days, in some institutions, like the Interior Ministry,  the average response timeframe is a month or longer.

In Bosnia and Herzegovina, BIRN filed 12 requests and it took regular follow-ups and reminders before the authorities ever responded, even though, as in Serbia, the legal deadline to respond is 15 days. In reality, it takes a month or more.

Looking at the annual reports of regional Commissioners, Serbia’s received the highest number of complaints, 64 per cent, during 2018. Albania came next, with 13 per cent, followed by North Macedonia, on 10 per cent and Montenegro, with 7 per cent. The lowest number of complaints reported by the Ombudsperson’s Office was in Bosnia and Herzegovina – 5 per cent – and in Kosovo, only 1 per cent.

BIRN’s analysis also showed that local government institutions are more responsive to requests for information while central government institutions are more likely to postpone decisions and eventually reject journalists’ requests. Possible reasons for this could be the nature and exclusivity of the information that these institutions possess.

The lowest positive response that BIRN journalists had, in term of individual institutions in the region, was with the Civil Aviation Authority in Albania, the Ministry of Foreign Trade in Bosnia, the Post in Kosovo and the Interior Ministry in Serbia.

As part of BIRN’s drive for openness, it has established a free, user-friendly, searchable online library of public documents and scraped database, called BIRN Source. To increase access to open data for journalists, in January 2020 BIRN will also launch a new online platform, the BIRN Investigative Resource Desk, BIRD, which will provide a digital space and user-friendly tools for better and stronger investigative journalism.

BIRD will provide journalists with various types of assistance, including a set of useful tools and information in one place related to freedom of information, data access and protection, cybersecurity and open-source datasets.

Read the full report here.

Download Albanian version here.

Download Serbian version here