Brcko Left on Sidelines in Bosnia Constitution Talks
04 07 2007 This
prosperous and harmonious town offers lessons on how Bosnia might be
run. Instead, its example is being ignored.
By
Saida Mustajbegovic in Brcko
As
the discussions heat up about the future of Bosnia and Herzegovina's
two entities, the future of the District of Brcko remains unknown. A
town with its own special status and administration, it has been left
out of the constitutional talks that began over 18 months ago.
Brcko
lies in Bosnia's north-east, on the right river bank of Sava. The
area of the District makes up only 1 percent of the country's
territory.
It
also lies at a strategic crossroads between the main routes running
east to west and north to south, 200 kilometres from both Sarajevo
and Belgrade and about 300 from Zagreb.
The
town's strategic position almost torpedoed the 1995 Dayton
negotiations on ending the Bosnian war, as neither the Serbs on one
side or the Bosniaks and Croats on the other could agree to which
entity Brcko should belong.
The
American Arbitrator, Roberts Owen, made sure it went to neither.
Instead the decision was made to put Brcko under international
supervision, demilitarize it, create a special legal framework,
organize a multi-ethnic educational system and conduct local
elections four years after the establishment of the District. The
territory obtained special status seven years ago.
Since
then, Brcko has become the most prosperous part of Bosnia, a place
where the local authorities function according to civil and not
national principles - unlike the rest of the country.
“The
initial prognosis said the District would survive three months at the
most,” Mirsad Djapo, mayor of Brcko, recalls.
Much
of the initial scepticism about the chances of success of Brcko
District was based on the failure of a similar political experiment
in Mostar. The south-western city remains divided between Bosniaks
and Croats, a place where the legacy of ethnic division has been
preserved.
“It
is with reason that we say 'Brcko is a model’ for the rest of the
country,” Asim Mujkic, an expert on the District of Brcko tells
Balkan Insight. “If this model was applied to the rest of the
country you would step on the toes of many people in Banja Luka,
Sarajevo and western Mostar - the established ethno-political elites
who ensure their existence by generating crises.”
But
the constitutional talks, which failed to win the approval of
Bosnia's local politicans last April, have barely mentioned the
future of this small but important area.
Instead,
talks have focused on the relationship between - and future status of
- the two entities. A year on, as the international community once
again attempts to resurect the failed talks, Brcko is again on the
sidelines.
Local
and international experts have suggested that the District be
included among the common state institutions or included in Article 1
of the Constitution as a specific local unit of self-administration.
When
Balkan Insight visited Brcko, the local Brigade of the Army of Bosnia
and Herzegovina was marking its fifteenth anniversary. Around the
same dates, the Republika Srpska's brigade celebrated its fifteenth
anniversaries as well. The solemn ceremonies of both former warring
parties passed off without incident.
Ethnic
divisions have not entirely disappeared in Brcko. Some restaurants
and coffee shops in town are still patronised only by representatives
of one ethnic group. But these divisions are not played out in the
institutional life of the District, in the police, education
department and the government.
The mayor thinks the
system established in Brcko has created a different and better
environment from the one prevailing in the rest of the country. “In
the two entities, government institutions operate in an environment
where one or two nations are a majority,” Djapo says. “Here...
members of all three nationalities are first and foremost citizens.
This approach has created a much more friendly environment, and it
should be institutionalized by including it in the Constitution.”
But
the future of the town depends on the outcome of the constitutional
talks taking place under international supervisors. “We would first
like to see the future design of the BiH Constitution before we
continue negotiations about the status of the District of Brcko,”
Raffi Gregorian tells Balkan Insight.
As
the current constitution, embodied in the Dayton Peace Agreement, was
made before the establishment of Brcko District, it does not address
Brcko's status.
Gregorian
says a way now needs to be found to formulate constitutional
relations between the District of Brcko and the state. If a consensus
is found among local politicans to abolish
the two entities, there will be no reason for the continued existence
of the District of Brcko. But if the concept of an ethno-territorial
federation wins out, “Brcko
will become a problem”,
according to Mujkic. “Brcko
comprises 1 per cent of the territorry of BiH. But at the same time
it is the only part of the country not organized on the basis of
ethnicity but on the basis of civic principles.”
The
international community knows most local people are pleased with the
current arrangement. “The District is a successful administrative
unit, people like living there and the local authorities like the
existing arrangement,” Gregorian says.
An
economic threat also hangs over the town if its status is downgraded
or compromised. The institutions developed within the District employ
more than 2,000 people today. If the town reverts to being an
ordinary local municipality, these jobs would be lost.
For
that reason, some people actually want Brcko to remain off the agenda
of the constitutional talks, arguing that any change is likely to be
for the worse.
“Why
change something that is good?” asks Zarko Papic, a local political
analyst. “Including this issue on the constitutional agenda may
only open up Pandora's Box.” End
Saida
Mustajbegovic is a Sarajevo-based Balkan Insight contributor. Balkan
Insight is BIRN's online publication.
This
article has been produced as part of BIRN’s Bosnia Constitutional
Reforms project, which is financed by the Swiss Embassy in Sarajevo
and the University of Sarajevo's Human Rights Center.
Komentari:
Brcko
Poslao: 2007-07-07 15:48:00,
The issue of the Brcko district is far more complex and goes back to Dayton. Based on the Final Award - which the OHR in Sarajevo never welcomed, the BD can not simply disappear. What is needed is a completely new Constitution for BiH, and based on the current environment (which is not different than what has existed for over a decade), it may be prudent to look back to the Vance-Owen peace plan or some thing similar. The Federation has for all intents and purposes disenfranchised the Croats; hence the need for perhaps a 3rd entity and with the BD remaining as is. BiH can not move forward through an overly centralized State - operating out of Sarajevo - at the expense of certain segments of society who continue to believe - quite rightly - that BiH is moving more and more towards a unitary (one person-one vote) system.