Apply Now for a BIRN Reporting Democracy Grant

From Poznań to Podgorica, and from Prague to Plovdiv, journalists across Central and Southeast Europe are invited to pitch ideas for in-depth reporting projects on issues shaping democracy across the region.

This grant opportunity, covering fees and field research expenses, will allow journalists to report on a range of topics, from politics and economy to human rights, corruption, the rule of law, and security, that they feel need to be explored in-depth and brought to the attention of the wider public.

Grants worth €1.500 are available for professional freelance or staff journalists and teams, with ideas for investigative, analytical, or feature stories. Reporting Democracy will provide editorial support and a platform for publishing and distributing stories.

Deadline for submitting applications is July 1, 2026

Apply by filling out an application form here. 

General rules for call for applications:

Grants are available for journalists from across the Visegrad and Balkan region (Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Kosovo, Albania, North Macedonia, Greece).

Formal applicants can be:

  • individual journalists, working as part of newsroom structures as well as freelancers;
  • teams with the designated team leader being the contract signatory.

A maximum of six grants will be awarded in this cycle. And each applicant may submit only one application under this grant scheme.

Amount per grant: EUR 1.500.

Eligible expenses include:

  • fee;
  • travel expenses;
  • various production costs (documents, videographer, photographer, etc).

How to apply:

Applicants should use the RD grants application form to submit the application (LINK).

The application form should be completed in English.

Additional documentation can be submitted in an online format.

Clarifications will only be requested when the information provided is not sufficient to conduct an objective assessment.

The application must be submitted by 23:59 CET on July 1, 2026. In case of additional enquiries, please contact us at: [email protected]

Evaluation and selection:

Step I: Technical evaluation done by BIRN staff to ensure applicants followed the application procedures and submitted all required documents.

Step II: Evaluation by the editorial board will be done to select applicants based on evaluation criteria, including:

  1. Quality of the proposed idea, its relevance, and originality
  2. Feasibility of the proposed plan;
  3. Ability to reach a broad public.

Step III: Notification of applicants.

Successful candidates will be informed within four weeks after the close of the call.

Reporting Democracy is a cross-border journalistic platform dedicated to exploring where democracy is headed across large parts of Europe. In addition to generating a steady stream of features, interviews and analytical pieces by our own correspondents, we support local journalists by commissioning stories and providing grants for in-depth features and investigations.

Detektor and Moldova Colleagues Awarded for Investigation into Russian Camps

Detektor journalists Irvin Pekmez, Enes Hodzic and Nino Bilajac, as co-authors with the media outlet CU SENS, won second place at the “Superscrieri” journalism awards in Romania in the “TV and Video Journalism” category.

The award from the “Friends for Friends” Foundation was presented on May 27 to CU SENS journalist Malvina Cojocari, who, in cooperation with Detektor and the organisation FactCheck from Bulgaria, showed how people from Moldova were trained in Russia, Serbia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina to use weapons and drones carrying explosive devices for use in mass unrest in Moldova.

“This award represents recognition for the work, responsibility, and passion I invest in journalism. It confirms that the stories I choose to tell reach people and have significance in society. At the same time, this recognition motivates me to continue practicing journalism with the same sincerity and dedication,” Cojocari told Detektor.

The programme “Investigation: Trained to Cause Chaos. Part II” ranks among the best media content published in Moldova during 2025. In addition to the “TV and Video Journalism” category, it was also nominated for the “Investigative Journalism” category.

The collaboration with the Moldovan media organisation CU SENS and Cojocari in 2025 resulted in the publication of two joint investigations, accompanied by TV programmes in summer that year.

One was published on Detektor.ba while another was simultaneously published on the CU SENS website.

The joint investigation revealed that at least eight Moldovan citizens between July and September 2024, were trained in Russian camps in Bosnia on how to use weapons and drones with explosive devices.

The plan was to provoke unrest in Moldova as part of mass disturbances organised by unidentified structures under Kremlin control.

Among the recruiters were people involved in vandalizing certain buildings in Paris in 2023. Some of the instructors and coordinators are linked to the Russian paramilitary group Wagner.

First place was awarded to colleagues from Ziarul de Gardă for the investigative series “The Kremlin’s Digital Army” and to the organisation Recorder for the investigation “The Largest Ghost Company, Confirmed by ANAF.”

Third place in the same category also went to Recorder for the piece “Alone. The Endless Nightmare of Abandoned Children.”

Out of a total of 300 submissions, a jury composed of 22 media experts selected 53 works published during 2025, which were nominated across nine competition categories: Journalism Debut, Local Media, TV and Video Journalism, Investigative Journalism, Feature Writing, Thematic Journalism, Innovation, Interview, and Civic Influencers.

The “Friends for Friends” Foundation is a Romanian nonprofit organisation focused on media work, social impact, education and creativity, which organised the awards in the investigative and TV journalism categories.

Meet the People Behind BIRN: Dorentina Kastrati

Dorentina Kastrati is BIRN Kosovo’s editor/journalist and project coordinator. Over the past 10 years, since she joined BIRN as an intern, she has witnessed all the changes and growth BIRN has been going through.

But, away from her job, Dorentina knows how to disconnect from the fast pace of daily work. Let’s meet her.

She first learned about BIRN during her journalism studies, while she analyzed reporting from various media outlets in Kosovo.

“What consistently stood out to me was the professionalism and courage of the BIRN Kosovo team.

As a result, I began following the work of the BIRN team closely, even outside of university, and whenever I thought about where I would like to work in the future, BIRN was always my goal,” Dorentina explains.

Another detail is that at the beginning of her studies, she lived in the student dormitories, which were located very close to BIRN’s offices.

“Every day, on my way to university lectures, I would pass by their offices. In a way, I feel I manifested it until I eventually became part of the team in 2016 as an intern,” she adds.

BIRN Kosovo has evolved significantly over the 10 years since she started working there, both editorially and organisationally.

“The organisation has expanded its investigative work, strengthened its multimedia and digital capacities, and is increasingly focused on combating disinformation and promoting media literacy. At the same time, BIRN has remained committed to its core mission of public-interest journalism and accountability, which I believe is one of its greatest strengths,” Dorentina notes.

What stands out to her most over this period is not only the growth in capacity but also the ability of BIRN Kosovo to adapt to a rapidly changing media environment.

“We have moved from more traditional reporting formats to more dynamic storytelling and audience engagement, while maintaining editorial independence and credibility. From my perspective, this evolution has also meant continuous learning and professional growth, as the organisation has encouraged innovation while staying grounded in its mission,” she says.

Working through these changes has allowed Dorentina to grow professionally.

“Seeing how BIRN Kosovo has adapted to new challenges while preserving its values has been one of the most rewarding aspects of being part of the organisation,” she stresses.

When she first joined BIRN in 2016, she expected to grow professionally and contribute to meaningful journalism. She did not necessarily imagine that she would still be here ten years later, let alone that she would also become involved in project-related work.

“Over time, however, BIRN became a place where I continuously learned, challenged myself, and felt motivated by the work we do.

The dynamic environment, the diversity of projects, and the variety of work – from news reporting and investigative articles to investigative TV stories, writing project proposals, implementing projects, organising trainings, conferences, and roundtables, publishing important reports, and producing documentaries – has kept the work engaging and meaningful. The impact of our work is what made me stay and grow with the organisation,” she explains.

What also kept her here was the opportunity to work with dedicated colleagues, adapt to new challenges, and contribute to projects that have real impact.

“Looking back, I can say that these ten years have brought not only professional growth but also a strong sense of purpose and belonging,” she says.

She says both aspects of her work – project-related and journalism – complement each other.

“Journalism provides the opportunity to tell important stories, investigate issues that affect citizens, and contribute to public accountability,” she says.

Project-related work, on the other hand, allows me to work strategically, develop initiatives with long-term impact, and collaborate with different stakeholders. I also value the fact that, through projects, journalistic work can often be planned and implemented, which in a way represents another form of contribution to journalism itself.

“Through projects, important media initiatives, investigative work, public awareness campaigns, and capacity-building activities can be supported and realized, creating a broader and more sustainable impact,” Dorentina explains.

She values the combination of both, as it gives her both creative and organisational fulfillment while also allowing her to contribute to journalism from different angles.

“Shortly after I began my internship, my editor recognised that I had the potential to become a journalist covering areas such as economics, public procurement, energy and auditing. Before I even realised it, I found myself enthusiastically working on investigations involving tenders with hundreds of pages of documentation to review and analyze.

Over time, I realised that I genuinely enjoyed this type of work. These were fields with relatively few specialized journalists, and I found great satisfaction in writing about complex and demanding topics that required more in-depth analysis, patience, and a strong commitment to investigative work,” Dorentina recalls.

There are several stories she worked on that she’s especially proud of.

“The investigation I am most proud of is “The Suspicious Tender for the Minister’s Family,” which earned me the award for Best Investigation in Public Procurement in 2021. The investigation uncovered issues involving conflicts of interest, family connections, and political ties intertwined within the procurement process.

I am also particularly proud of the investigations published during the COVID-19 pandemic, which exposed manipulation and misconduct related to the pricing of masks and other products purchased by various public institutions. These investigations highlighted abuses and irregularities in public spending during a time of crisis,” she explains.

However, she encounters some obstacles in her everyday work, such as the rapidly evolving nature of disinformation and the speed at which false narratives spread online.

“In today’s digital environment, misinformation can spread much faster than verified information, which makes it increasingly important to ensure accuracy, fact-checking, and responsible reporting. This requires continuous adaptation to new communication trends, digital platforms, and methods of verifying information in order to maintain credibility and provide the public with reliable content,” Dorentina says.

Another challenge is maintaining public trust in the media in an increasingly polarized information environment.

“Audiences are often exposed to conflicting narratives, political influence, and information overload, which can lead to skepticism toward media institutions. For this reason, transparency, ethical standards, and professional integrity become essential in strengthening credibility and building long-term trust with audiences.

However, these challenges also create opportunities for innovation, stronger partnerships, and more effective approaches to delivering meaningful, credible, and socially impactful work,” she adds.

When it comes to BIRN Kosovo, there are some things Dorentina would like to see.

“I would like to see continued investment in professional development, innovation, and staff well-being. As the media landscape changes rapidly, it is important to continuously adapt, strengthen digital capacities, and create more opportunities for creative and investigative work,” she notes.

At the end of her working day, outside work, she enjoys reading, spending time in nature, listening to music, and traveling whenever possible.

“I also enjoy Pilates and moments that help me disconnect from the fast pace of daily work. I value meaningful conversations, quiet moments by the sea, and spending time with friends and family,” Dorentina concludes.

Terms of Reference – Final external evaluation of BIRN Kosovo project

Assignment reference: Undertake a comprehensive overall evaluation of the results achieved in the project and provide recommendations for possible scaling up of the project.

Project reference: “Uncovering the Truth: Combating Monoethnic Journalism and Advocating for the Missing Persons in Kosovo”, funded by the European Union Office in Kosovo and implemented by Balkan Investigative Reporting Network (BIRN) Kosovo and Advocacy Center for Democratic Culture (ACDC).

Project number: 2023/452-338

Project period: 15/01/2024 – 15/07/2026

Deadline for applications: 10/06/2026, at 17.00.

  1. Background Information

BIRN Kosovo is an independent, non-governmental, investigative and analytical journalism organisation. It seeks to provide momentum to the democratic transition in Kosovo by promoting and advocating for accountability, rule of law and policy reform within both public and private institutions. One of BIRN Kosovo’s key goals is maintaining its position as the premier investigative and analytical journalism organisation in Kosovo and continuing to report on the country’s most pressing issues in politics, economics and society.

BIRN Kosovo was awarded a contract by the European Union Office in Kosovo with the overall aim of contributing to transforming the discourse surrounding the missing persons issue, paving the way for reconciliation, resolution and mutual understanding, all while advocating for the rights of their families. This action aims to achieve the overall objective through a combination of methods that seek to educate, inform, and stimulate public discourse.

To ensure a comprehensive approach and a more nuanced understanding of the problem, BIRN is partnering with the Advocacy Center for Democratic Culture (ACDC), a Serb NGO based in North Mitrovica. This partnership serves to encompass both Albanian and Serbian perspectives, to offer an unbiased and fact-based narrative on the missing persons issue. Together, as project partners, we will align all the affected communities to create an environment of shared understanding and a common pursuit for the truth.

The overall amount of the project was EUR 216,666.67, with an implementation period of 30 months.

Expected project results

  • Result 1: Media deliver balanced, effective and empathetic narratives around the missing persons’ issues.
  • Result 2: Public discourse is invigorated and comprehension of the missing persons deepened.
  • Result 3: Public dialogue initiated, understanding of the missing persons issue deepened and active public involvement stimulated.
  • Result 4: Contribute to an environment where transparency, accountability, and public trust in the justice system’s approach to missing persons cases are strengthened.
  • Result 5: Public’s focus on the issue maintained through offering a continuous stream of informative and compelling content on the experiences of missing persons and their families, and updates on investigations. 

Target groups

  • Families of missing persons
  • Journalists and media outlets
  • Representatives of the Special Prosecutor’s Office
  • Local and Central Level Government Officials
  • Academia and Researchers
  • Project partners

The project is led by BIRN Kosovo in partnership with Advocacy Center for Democratic Culture (ACDC).

  1. Objective, purpose and expected results

The purpose of this request is for the evaluator/evaluation company to undertake a comprehensive overall evaluation of the results achieved in the project and provide recommendations for possible scaling up of the project.

Objective of evaluation

The main objective of this evaluation is to undertake an overall assessment of the results of the “Uncovering the Truth: Combating Monoethnic Journalism and Advocating for the Missing Persons in Kosovo” project, to be provided to BIRN Kosovo’s management and the EU Office in Kosovo. The evaluation will take place over at least 15 working days in June and July 2026.

Within the scope of the evaluation, a report will be drafted comprising an assessment of the results and outcomes achieved through the project and their impact on target groups and stakeholders.

The evaluation should compare the overall results of the project in terms of their effectiveness, efficiency and relevance and provide an assessment of the extent to which BIRN has fulfilled these standards. The report should also offer an assessment of the management, outcome and output levels of the project and lessons learnt by the participating target groups.

The evaluation report should also provide an assessment of the potential and opportunities for continuing and scaling up the initiative.

Subject and focus of evaluation

The results of the evaluation that will be conducted for BIRN Kosovo will be presented to the organisation’s management and to the project’s donor. The evaluation should:

  • Analyse the extent to which the Action has contributed to reaching the overall objective, specific objectives and expected results;
  • Assess the allocation of resources for Action implementation, project management arrangements and role divisions;
  • Assess the external factors affecting the Action and the extent to which the Action has been able to act in accordance with its objectives despite the circumstantial changes throughout the Action’s implementation;
  • Assess the extent to which Action partners and other stakeholders were satisfied with Action implementation;
  • Analyse the potential and opportunities for continuing and scaling up the initiative;
  • Identify and highlight good practices that could potentially contribute to scaling up and/or replicating the initiative.

Methodology

The evaluation of this project should be in line with international standards and practices in project evaluation, with a special emphasis on the OECD DAC Evaluation Quality Standards.

The steps proposed to be undertaken for this evaluation are as follows:

  • Review of project documentation, monitoring and progress records and other relevant reports;
  • Initial meeting with project team to agree on the evaluation’s specific design and methods, evaluation questions that will need to be answered, allotted time and data limitations;
  • Interviews with 8 individuals including key staff involved in project implementation and other relevant stakeholders;
  • Develop a detailed plan for the evaluation process;
  • Write/outline a draft evaluation report and present it to the project team;
  • Incorporate feedback sent by the project team into the final report;
  • Draft the final report with an executive summary.

The information sources that will be available to the evaluation team are:

  • Project documents;
  • Project reports;
  • Other documents and materials, including but not limited to, the published online and televised reports, video and televised programmes and materials, daily and investigative articles, TV documentary, pictures, etc. produced within the scope of the Action.

NOTE: Please note that the work (including interviews) may be conducted online or physically in person, as required.

Main evaluation questions

The evaluation process will be conducted based on core considerations, such as relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency impact and sustainability, with particular attention paid to the questions presented in the subsections below.

Relevance

  • To what extent does the project target the needs of its target group?
  • Have the EU recommendations regarding gender, social standards, reconciliation and the environment been considered?

Coherence

  • What is BIRN’s stance towards and actions on reconciliation, and what have their impacts been during the EU’s support?
  • To what extent has the project empowered the target groups?
  • What factors (internal and external) have affected performance, and have they been taken into consideration?

Effectiveness

  • To what extent has the project contributed to the achievement of the overall objective?
  • Has it achieved its purpose, expected results and desired outputs?
  • Have the project’s activities been adequate to achieve the objectives?

Efficiency

  • Have the project resources been used in a cost-effective manner?
  • How would you evaluate the efficiency of project management (including the effectiveness of partnership strategy and stakeholder involvement from a best practice perspective)?
  • Has the financial management been an integral part of achieving project results (with particular reference to adequate reporting, identification of problems and adjustment of activities, budgets and inputs)?
  • How would you assess the monitoring system during project evaluation, focusing on the relevance of performance indicators?
  • Are the project’s activities and outputs consistent with the overall goal and the attainment of its objectives?
  • Are the project’s activities and outputs consistent with the intended impacts and effects?
  • Impact
  • Does the project have the potential to be replicated, either in terms or expansion or repetition, and have any steps been taken to do so?
  • How many people have been affected?

Sustainability

  • How would you assess the prospects for activities continuing after the end of the project, including the potential of the organisation to be sustainable, and what would be the impact of the organisation’s identity on this?

Evaluation approach and timetable

  • A detailed description on evaluation approach and methods are provided below:
Inception report — including detailed methodology, work plan and evaluation matrix prepared and accepted 2 working days from signing of the contract
Field work: discussion and interviews with the 8 individuals, including project team, stakeholders, beneficiaries 4 working days
Draft evaluation report 5 working days
Finalise the draft/evaluation report sent to project team 2 working days
Final evaluation report (approx. 10 pages with summary of 1-page max.) in English 2 working days

 Required skills and competences of the evaluator/evaluation company

  • Excellent analytical and writing skills;
  • Proven capacities to produce reports;
  • Possesses knowledge in media or sustainable development issues;
  • Good application of results-based management;
  • Good communication, coordination and facilitation skills;
  • Constantly ensures timely and quality work;
  • Displays cultural, gender, religious, racial, nationality and age sensitivity, and adaptability;
  • Demonstrates integrity by modelling ethical standards;
  • Preferable experience in evaluation of projects regarding sustainable development issues;
  • Openness to change and ability to receive/integrate feedback.

Experience

  • Minimum of 5 years relevant professional experience (of the evaluator or team proposed by the company), preferably in NGO and media or sustainable development issues;
  • Experience in evaluation of communication/media projects, including those on sustainable development issues;
  • Experience in at least one project within the scope of the environment.

Personal/organisational qualification

  • Ability to deliver when working under pressure and within changing circumstances;
  • Excellent writing/reporting and presentation skills;
  • Excellent interpersonal skills.

Language

  • Excellent knowledge of written and spoken English and Albanian languages.

NOTE:  The evaluator/evaluation company must be independent from both the policy-making process and the delivery and management of assistance.

Reports

The draft evaluation report and final evaluation report need to be structured according to the OECD/DAC criteria and the evaluation questions.

Report content

  • Title page;
  • List of acronyms and abbreviations;
  • Table of contents, including list of annexes;
  • Executive summary;
  • Introduction: background and context of the programme;
  • Description of the programme – its logic theory, results framework and external factors likely to affect success;
  • Purpose of the evaluation;
  • Key questions and scope of the evaluation with information on limitations;
  • Approach and methodology;
  • Findings;
  • Summary and explanation of findings and interpretations;
  • Conclusion;
  • Recommendations;
  • Lessons, generalisations, alternatives;

The criteria of utility, credibility and relevance/appropriateness will be used for assessing the quality of the evaluation report:

  • The report must be written in professional and clear English language;
  • The executive summary should be a concise chapter (not exceeding three pages), highlighting the evaluation mandate, approach, key findings, conclusions and recommendations;
  • The information in the report must be complete, well structured, concise and clearly presented;
  • All information in the report must be adequately documented and support the findings;
  • The information in the report must addresses priority or strategic information needs;
  • Findings and recommendations must be evidenced, concrete and implementable;
  • Human rights and a gender equality perspective must be considered.

Coordination between the parties

The focal points within the project management team will assist and facilitate the work of the evaluator/evaluation team by providing logistical support. All project-related documents will be available to the evaluator/evaluation team.

Application procedure

Qualified and interested candidates should submit their applications electronically to [email protected] no later than June 10, 2026, at 17:00.

Applications should include:

  1. Proposal:
  • Cover letter – explaining why they are the most suitable for the work;
  • Brief methodology on the approach to the work and how it will be conducted (max. 500 words);
  1. Financial proposal

The financial proposal should specify a total lump sum amount, and payment terms around specific and measurable (qualitative and quantitative) deliverables (i.e. whether payments fall in instalments or upon completion of the entire contract). Payments are based upon deliverables and will not exceed €2,000.

  1. Personal CV and/or organisational portfolio, including experience in similar projects and at least three (3) references letters.

BIRN Kosovo Debates Missing People in Gjakova Region

On May 22, BIRN Kosovo and ACDC premiered a documentary on missing people in the Gjakova region and held a public discussion in Gjakova to explore challenges in the issue of missing people from the Kosovo war and the role of justice in the process.

Produced as part of the EU-funded project “Unveiling the Truth: Combating Monoethnic Journalism and Advocating for Missing Persons in Kosovo,” the documentary highlighted the lasting impact of war crimes on families and communities across Kosovo and included stories and testimonies coming from the families of missing people from the Municipalities of Gjakova, Rahovec and Malisheva, from activists and representatives of institutions that deal with the grievances of the past in Kosovo.

A public discussion followed the documentary screening, making this event part of a broader series of public discussions on transitional justice and missing persons in Kosovo. According to the data and testimonies presented, this region was one of the most badly destroyed regions in the country, with the highest number of victims, property damage and other losses. This discussion was moderated by BIRN Kosovo Executive Director and journalist Jeta Xharra.

Panelists included Ilir Morina, from the Special Prosecution, Arsim Gerxhaliu, from the Institute of Forensic Medicine, Teki Bokshi, a lawyer, Selami Hoti, an activist, and Kreshnik Gashi, from KALLXO.com.

Ilir Morina informed the audience that the State Prosecution has conducted dozens of investigative activities in the region and an indictment is currently taking place. Arsim Gerxhaliu raised a concern that during his long career in this field he has encountered many family members who had paid a lot to supposedly receive information about the fate of their missing, which turned out only to be schemes for profit coming from individuals and small interest groups unrelated to the matter, using the pain of family members for their own profit. Lawyer Teki Bokshi said the actual number of missing people in Kosovo (1,560) serves as proof that state institutions failed to resolve this matter, 27 years after the war ended in Kosovo.

Selami Hoti, a lifelong activist from the Krusha region, called for more institutional support for the families of missing people. Kreshnik Gashi from KALLXO.COM emphasized the crucial importance of information sharing in this process.  All the panelists and participants urged the political level to do more.

The event was attended by 63  participants, 41 of whom were women. Participants included representatives from local authorities in the Municipality of Gjakova, civil society activists, victims’ associations and students

This event was organised in the framework of “Unveiling the Truth: Combating Monoethnic Journalism and Advocating for Missing Persons in Kosovo”, a project funded by the European Union.

Apply Now: Call For Proposals For Journalists From Montenegro and Kosovo

Balkan Investigative Reporting Network, BIRN, has launched an open call for independent journalists in Kosovo and Montenegro to apply for anti-corruption reporting grants under the project Society Against Corruption in Montenegro and Kosovo.

The initiative supports in-depth investigations and multimedia stories focused on corruption, accountability and governance in sectors such as healthcare, education and the environment.

Selected journalists will receive grants of up to $1,500, alongside mentoring and technical support from BIRN editors and experts. Projects should highlight systemic corruption issues affecting local communities and contribute to greater public awareness, transparency and institutional accountability.

The call is open to independent journalists with 3–5 years of professional experience who are citizens or residents of Kosovo or Montenegro. Applicants must submit one story proposal in English, a CV, and a letter of support from the media outlet where the story will be published.

📅 Application deadline: 14 June 2026
📍 Project duration: Up to 3 months (starting June 2026)
📧 Applications: [email protected]

Read the full call and application details HERE.

BIRN Kosovo Premieres Documentary on Missing Persons From Prizren Region

On May 22, BIRN Kosovo and ACDC premiered a documentary on missing people, followed by a panel discussion that highlighted the challenges on missing persons from the Kosovo war from all communities.

Produced as part of the EU-funded project “Unveiling the Truth: Combating Monoethnic Journalism and Advocating for Missing Persons in Kosovo,” the documentary highlighted the lasting impact of war crimes on families and communities across Kosovo and included stories and testimonies from the families of missing people from the municipalities of Prizren, Suhareka, Dragash and Mamusha and from representatives of relevant institutions addressing the grievances of the past in Kosovo.

A discussion followed the documentary screening, making this event part of a broader series of public discussions on transitional justice and missing persons in Kosovo.

According to the data presented, 1,560 persons remain missing in Kosovo, including 280 people from this region. This discussion was moderated by BIRN Kosovo Executive Director and journalist Jeta Xharra and included representatives from Kosovo institutions and civil society organisations involved in the process.

Panelists included Ilir Morina, from the Special Prosecution, Kushtrim Gara, from the Government Commission on Missing Persons, Ditor Haliti, from the Institute of Forensic Medicine, Agron Limani, an activist from the Krusha region, Aleksandar Rapajic, ACDC, and Kreshnik Gashi, from KALLXO.com.

The panelists highlighted the importance of accountability and overall cooperation for the broader transitional justice process in Kosovo. Information sharing by the families of missing persons throughout the process is crucial, especially given that some family members in the Prizren region refuse to provide any DNA data to the relevant authorities.

IML representative Ditor Haliti emphasized the importance of information sharing, especially coming from the families of missing people which, for any piece of information they possess, should approach Kosovo institutions.

All the panelists highly evaluated the impact of such activities conducted by BIRN Kosovo and ACDC since they serve also as a joint call to all communities in Kosovo to come together and do their part, also calling for the political level to do more.

The event was attended by 93 participants, of whom 63 were women. Participants included representatives from local authorities in the Municipality of Prizren, activists, members of academia, students, and family members of persons missing from the war.

This event was organised in the framework of “Unveiling the Truth: Combating Monoethnic Journalism and Advocating for Missing Persons in Kosovo” project, funded by the European Union.

BIRN Awards Grants to 20 Journalists Through MOST Project

Through the Media Organisations for Stronger Transnational Journalism (MOST) project, BIRN has awarded grants to 20 journalists to produce investigative stories addressing key issues across Europe.

The Media Organisations for Stronger Transnational Journalism (MOST) project aims to strengthen investigative reporting and cross-border collaboration by supporting journalists working on critical social, political and economic topics.

Through the project, BIRN awarded grants to 20 journalists, selected through three rounds of an open call.

Each selected journalist received financial support of €1,140 along with editorial mentoring provided by experienced editors from BIRN. The supported projects are implemented over a period of three to six months, allowing journalists to develop in-depth investigative stories.

First Round of Grants

The following journalists were selected in the first round:

  • Kristina Bohmer (Slovakia)
  • Seda Karatabanoglu (France)
  • Laura Carrer (Italy)
  • Stefania D’Ignoti (Italy)
  • Clémentine Méténier (France)
  • Harun Dinarević (Bosnia and Herzegovina)
  • Ana Ćurić (Serbia)

Second Round of Grants

The following journalists were selected in the second round:

  • Zhaoyin Feng (Netherlands)
  • Alina Yanchur (Poland)
  • Stavros Malichudis (Greece)
  • Siarhei Kuzniatsou (Lithuania)
  • Marta Abbà (Italy)
  • Tomislav Kukec (Croatia)
  • Dejan Rakita (Bosnia and Herzegovina)

Third Round of Grants

The following journalists were selected in the third and final round:

  • Sergei Panov (Spain)
  • Wouter Massink (Turkey)
  • Nemanja Marinović (Serbia)
  • Maja Boričić (Montenegro)
  • Đurđa Radulović (Montenegro)
  • Ersan Pajaziti (North Macedonia)

Supporting Investigative Journalism Across Europe

The selected journalists produce investigative stories that contribute to a better understanding of key developments across EU and EU-aspiring countries, with a focus on underreported issues and cross-border relevance. They also receive continuous editorial support and mentoring throughout the production process, strengthening both the quality of reporting and professional capacities.

The MOST project brings together a network of media organisations working to foster innovation, collaboration and the exchange of best practices in investigative journalism. The project is implemented by a consortium comprising: 1) Balkan Investigative Reporting Network (BIRN), 2) Centro per la Cooperazione Internazionale (CCI/OBCT); 3) El Orden Mundial – EOM, Spain; 4) European Pravda, Ukraine; 5) New Eastern Europe; 6) Le Courrier des Balkans – Courriers D’Europe et D’Orient – DcB, France; and 7) Stichting the Tactical Technology Collective – TTC, Netherlands. The project is funded by the European Commission through the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA).

BIRN Serbia Wins Two Prestigious ‘Dejan Anastasijevic’ Awards

Two reporters linked to BIRN won the Independent Association of Journalists of Serbia, NUNS, awards for investigative journalism presented on May 15.

The award for best investigative story went to BIRN contributor Barbara Matejcic for her investigation “Killing for a photograph: What is hidden behind the only photograph of death in the war in Yugoslavia”, published by BIRN Serbia.

Her awarded work examined the circumstances under which photographs from the war in the former Yugoslavia were taken in Brcko in Bosnia in May 1992, documenting acts of execution at close range.

Matejcic’s investigation raises critical questions regarding the circumstances that enabled the creation of these photographs, the roles of their authors, and the factors that made such documentation possible.

Starting this year, the award for reporting in the public interest was also presented to Jelena Kikic from Nova TV and BIRN Serbia’s Radmilo Markovic for their documentary “The General Staff Building: The collapse of the state.”

In the film, they present new documents and revelations to the public about the multi-year, secret project to build a luxury hotel on the site of the heavily damaged General Staff Building, which was conducted without informing or involving the public. The complex was targeted during the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999 and was left largely derelict.

In the category of investigative stories in local media, a group of authors – N. Stevanovic, Ivana Jovanovic and Dejana Cvetkovic were awarded for a series of texts about the position of Albanians in Serbia.

As in previous years, the audience voted for the shortlisted reportages. The reportage with the most votes was “N1 Journalists at the SNS meeting – from recruitment to payment of daily wages,” by young reporters Sara Sekulic and Milos Zekic.

“There is hope for our society as long as there are journalists who, despite everything, write in the public interest,” said NUNS President Zeljko Bodrozic at the award ceremony.

He added that investigative journalists and other professionals have worked in a “hostile environment created by the government” for more than 10 years.

Since 2020, the award has been named after the longtime Vreme magazine journalist Dejan Anastasijevic, who died in 2019.

The award is given on the occasion of World Media Freedom Day because investigative journalism is important for developing journalism, fighting corruption, resisting government and other power pressures on individuals or organizations, and supporting democratic development.

With this award, NUNS aims to support and affirm journalists who, in a serious and professional manner, address topics of great importance to the public in Serbia.

BIRN Albania Publishes EU AML Legislative Briefings to Support Reform Process

A new series of thematic legislative assessments prepared by Transparency International EU provides an accessible overview of the European Union’s updated anti-money laundering framework and its relevance for Albania’s ongoing legislative alignment.

As Albania advances its approximation with the European Union acquis, particularly under Chapters 23 (Judiciary and Fundamental Rights) and 24 (Justice, Freedom and Security), BIRN Albania has published a series of legislative briefings analysing key elements of the EU’s 2024 Anti-Money Laundering (AML) package. The materials, prepared by Transparency International EU within the project “Follow the Money: Strengthening Albania’s Anti-Money Laundering Initiatives”, cover areas including crypto-assets, beneficial ownership transparency, Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs), obliged entities, and real estate-related risks.

The European Union’s 2024 AML package represents the most comprehensive reform of its financial integrity framework in over a decade. It introduces a directly applicable single rulebook, strengthens transparency requirements, expands obligations for private-sector gatekeepers, enhances cooperation between Financial Intelligence Units, and establishes a new supranational supervisory authority — the Anti-Money Laundering Authority (AMLA).

These developments are particularly relevant for Albania’s ongoing legislative and institutional alignment process. The new EU framework reshapes how risks related to money laundering, organised crime proceeds, corruption-related assets and opaque ownership structures are identified, monitored and addressed. It also introduces important changes in areas such as beneficial ownership transparency, supervision of non-financial professions, access to registries, financial intelligence functions, and cross-border cooperation mechanisms.

The briefing papers are published in Albanian to support informed engagement by civil society organisations, journalists, researchers and other stakeholders in consultation processes related to these reforms. By making complex EU regulatory developments more accessible, the series aims to strengthen evidence-based public debate and support external monitoring of key areas, including:

  • beneficial ownership transparency,
  • supervision of obliged entities and professional intermediaries,
  • the operational capacity and independence of the Financial Intelligence Agency,
  • risks linked to organised crime proceeds and opaque ownership structures, and
  • transparency in higher-risk sectors such as real estate and crypto-assets.

These publications seek to support broader engagement with the EU AML reform agenda and to strengthen the capacity of watchdog actors to contribute to accountability during the implementation of upcoming legislative changes. As Albania continues its alignment with European standards in financial transparency and integrity, informed participation by non-state stakeholders will remain essential to an effective and resilient anti-money laundering system.

Read the briefing papers (in Albanian):

  1. Kuadri legjislativ i BE-së për kripto-asetet
  2. Kuadri i BE-së për sektorin e pasurive të paluajtshme
  3. Kuadri i BE-së për transparencën e pronësisë përfituese
  4. Kuadri institucional i BE-së për Njësitë e Inteligjencës Financiare
  5. Kuadri i BE-së për subjektet raportuese sipas paketës AML 2024