Plan to Send Jailed Bulgarians to Strasbourg Scorned
29 03 2007 Mainstream parties give novel attempt to free nurses in Libya a cool reception.
By Ekaterina Petrova in Sofia (Balkan Insight, 29 Mar 07)
Picture
the scene: as the Members of the European Parliament, MEPs, meet on
May 23, they stand to applaud the entry of 18 new members from
Bulgaria, the first ever elected from Bulgaria to serve in the
assembly.
But
as the MEPs clap, only 12 Bulgarians actually enter the chamber.
“Apologies”, they say. “Our colleagues are unable to come
because their death sentences in Libya have held them back.”
In
his office in Tripoli, the Libyan leader, Colonel Qaddafi, wrings his
hands. “I am going to have to let them go,” he murmurs. “They
are now members of the European Parliament.”
Such
was the scenario envisaged by one group of Bulgarian citizens, had
Bulgaria’s political parties accepted their proposal to nominate
the five nurses jailed in Libya as Bulgarian MEPs.
But
in spite of strong public and media support for the proposal,
parliament ruled out the possibility on March 28.
Now
the committee behind the initiative says the way politicians have
treated their plan shows they lack dedication to the problem.
The
Bulgarian nurses have been in jail for eight years, charged with
deliberately infecting 393 children with the HIV virus.
Libya’s
authorities arrested Christiana Vulcheva, Nasya Nenova, Snezhana
Dimitrova, Valentina Siropulo, Valya Chervenyashka, and Zdravko
Georgiev, a doctor, in February 1999, in connection with an HIV/AIDS
epidemic in a Benghazi children’s hospital.
Disregarding
reports by international scientists that insisted they were all
innocent of the charges, a Libyan court in May 2004
sentenced the five women to death.
At
the same time, Dr Georgiev was acquitted, though he has still not
been allowed to leave the country.
After
Libya’s Supreme Court ordered a retrial, the five women had their
death sentences confirmed in December 2006. The sentence is currently
being appealed against. A fresh verdict is expected in May.
Bulgaria
has tried all kinds of diplomatic tactics
and legal means to liberate the five
without success. The recent initiative to elect all six to the
European parliament was a novel, alternative, approach.
The
committee officially forwarded its request to all the parliamentary
parties last week, after several months in which the idea has been
floating in public.
Some
international as well as local media gave it support. In its March 15
issue, the Economist called it “an ingenious and commendable
suggestion”, adding that “it will catapult the scandal of the
imprisoned nurses into the heart of Europe’s political
institutions, and demonstrate an excellent non-partisan spirit in
Bulgarian politics (not always known for its sober pursuit of the
national interest).”
Few
local politicians saw it that way. Some complained that it was
unserious. Many independent observers also faulted the idea. “By
turning down the initiative, the politicians only demonstrated they
had common
sense,”
Zoya Dimitrova, a journalist for Politika weekly, commented.
The
politicians also noted that the proposal was technically inadmissible
as under the law, nominees for the European parliament must reside in
Bulgaria, or in another EU member state, for at least two years
preceding the elections. The jailed nurses have been away for eight.
“There
is no legal possibility to accomplish this initiative,” said
Desislav Chukolov, of the nationalist Ataka party.
In
reply, Alexandar Djurov, a law professor and a member of the
committee behind the initiative, suggested the law could be changed
if there was sufficient political will. “If there is a will, there
is a way,” he said.
He
turned out to be right, in the sense that political will was clearly
lacking. After a proposal to amend the law, submitted by United
Democratic Forces MP Yane Yanev, reached the plenary hall of
parliament on March 28, deputies rejected it.
Politicians
found other shortcomings in the initiative, beyond the
technicalities.
While
the initiative committee said electing the nurses to Strasbourg would
offer Libya’s leader “an easy way to get rid of the hot potato he
now doesn’t know how to handle”, as committee member Vasil
Vasilev put it, many deputies disagreed.
Kristian
Vigenin, from the ruling Coalition for Bulgaria, said he did not
believe electing the nurses would necessarily assist their plight.
Vigenin said he doubted that “MEPs or MPs from other countries
would be freed from responsibility [in Libya] just because of that
[being elected]”.
Some
politicians criticised the idea as “populist” and also denied it
would help the nurses in any practical way. Borislav Ralchev, deputy
head of the National Movement Simeon the Second, NDSV, said making
the medics European deputies would not put Libya under any legal
obligation to do anything about them.
Others
went further, dubbing the idea as indecent. “It is unfair to play
with an issue that is so sensitive to society and to test the
feelings of the victims and their relatives,” said Antonia
Purvanova, of the NDSV.
The
opposition dismissed the idea on other grounds. Asen Agov, of the
Democrats for a Strong Bulgaria, said that despite his party’s
requests, the government and the institutions involved with the case
had not come up with an expert opinion concerning the concrete
results that the initiative might yield.
However
reasonable the politicians’ objections sound, they do little to
help the feelings of the victims. “It is the moment for the
politicians, parliament and diplomats to show how far they are
committed to solving our problem,” Dr Georgiev told the media.
Despite
the blow it received on March 28, the initiative may still have some
life in it. On March 29, Yane Yanev, who submitted the proposal to
parliament, said that his party Order, Lawfulness, and Justice, still
intends to nominate the medics, despite the legal problems and the
need to collect 10,000 signatures for each candidate - a requirement
for non-partisan nominees.
Ekaterina
Petrova is BIRN Bulgaria project coordinator. Balkan Insight is
BIRN’s online publication.